
When the Right to Information Act (RTI) was enacted some time ago, it created an unprecedented wave of optimism and activity among the general populace. We heard a lot of stories where people exercised their rights and made the corrupt and the vicious bite the dust. Now with time, the enthusiasm has waned and I think the loopholes have been discovered and being used to avoid the same.
Certain informations related to national security were never covered in this act for justifiable reasons. But as the debate surrounding the N-Deal rages on, it brings about certain questions.
• Lots of time has been spent by the media and the experts discussing the pros and cons of the deal. But does anyone know the complete picture?
• The government keeps saying it is in national interest. So why can’t they stand up and declare a concrete assurance?
• Finally why can’t they make the relevant information public? It is an issue of national security. But for the same reason the public has to know the implications of it. Where is the transparency in the process?
Due to such reluctance in taking the people into faith, other parties have got the opportunity to create a pseudo-populist melodrama. The left parties are trying to create a sensation by posing as the greatest patriots. But when we see them warning the Samajwadi Party saying that supporting the N Deal would cost Muslim votes, we know that it is no patriotism and only petty votebank politics. Perhaps Mulayam Singh Yadav has done a good thing (one of the rare good things for him) by asking the PM to clear the doubts in public. But still we have not seen any positive development. Hope they realize it very soon and clear the doubt in our minds. After all this how they can save the government!
Na Khata Na Bahi, Kalam Sahab Jo Kahey Wahi Sahi
Eerily similar to the Congress party's famous line on Sitaram Kesri who was the treasurer of the party and afectionately called chacha or uncle.
Na Khata Na Bahi, Chacha Jo Kahey Wahi Sahi
Thanks for the comments guys...
I do believe we have that we have a case of mistaken priorities. The N deal might be important from an energy security point of view. But for the same reason all the aspects has to be clarified. All the parties are playing their cards in this issue as they are getting a lot of media attention.
About our political drama...neither Left has been able to convince others as to why they are opposing the deal...it is just using the issue to blackmail UPA for long time. Whereas inflation is more urgent issue...and it is not using that either...
We get to hear occasional talks about other sources like solar, wind, geothermal energy etc. But I don’t know why such things are not scaled up!
Nice piece, indeed.
Local Opinions (12)
a) The Nuclear Suppliers Group members are under no obligation to sell nuclear fuel to India. They can deny India if they have different national policies to that of the US. E.g. Australia recently denied selling uranium to India because they want India to sign the NPT first. This might mean that the nuclear power stations that India might build with the important technology may be rendered non-functional useless units due to unavailability of fuel.
b) Why should we sign something that guarantees an external agency like IAEA to put checks and inspect on the civilian reactors for misuse 'in perpetuity'. It leaves no scope for India to walk out of the deal.
c) Why should India jump the gun and sign the dotted lines when it doesn't know yet what the final draft would be and what the language of the agreement would look like. We must not forget that it is yet to be passed in the American Congress.
Na Khata Na Bahi, Kalam Sahab Jo Kahey Wahi Sahi
Eerily similar to the Congress party's famous line on Sitaram Kesri who was the treasurer of the party and afectionately called chacha or uncle.
Na Khata Na Bahi, Chacha Jo Kahey Wahi Sahi
Thanks for the comments guys...
I do believe we have that we have a case of mistaken priorities. The N deal might be important from an energy security point of view. But for the same reason all the aspects has to be clarified. All the parties are playing their cards in this issue as they are getting a lot of media attention.
About our political drama...neither Left has been able to convince others as to why they are opposing the deal...it is just using the issue to blackmail UPA for long time. Whereas inflation is more urgent issue...and it is not using that either...
We get to hear occasional talks about other sources like solar, wind, geothermal energy etc. But I don’t know why such things are not scaled up!
Nice piece, indeed.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 













a) The Nuclear Suppliers Group members are under no obligation to sell nuclear fuel to India. They can deny India if they have different national policies to that of the US. E.g. Australia recently denied selling uranium to India because they want India to sign the NPT first. This might mean that the nuclear power stations that India might build with the important technology may be rendered non-functional useless units due to unavailability of fuel.
b) Why should we sign something that guarantees an external agency like IAEA to put checks and inspect on the civilian reactors for misuse 'in perpetuity'. It leaves no scope for India to walk out of the deal.
c) Why should India jump the gun and sign the dotted lines when it doesn't know yet what the final draft would be and what the language of the agreement would look like. We must not forget that it is yet to be passed in the American Congress.